Challenge
Systems engineering, training, and work design could be greatly
improved by computer models that realistically simulate how
humans work. These models could apply skills and reasoning but
also commit errors and encounter time or accuracy constraints,
just as humans would. However, complete, validated models don't
yet exist.
The
available human performance models needed to be benchmarked
against real human behavior and extended to model multi-tasking
and learning.
The Air Force Research Laboratory’s long-range research
project, Agent-based Modeling and Behavioral Research, performed
the benchmarking and extension for human performance models,
including the CHI Systems COGNET/iGEN product.
Result
CHI Systems Human Performance Engineering Practice and Cognitive Engineering
Practice, working with additional support of the Office of Naval
Research, collaborated to extend iGEN’s modeling capabilities
to:
-
make better predictive simulations for the time aspects of
both physical and cognitive activities
- provide
a representation of metacognitive self-awareness so that the
model can better monitor and adapt is own behavior
- create
a capability for iGEN to perform category learning.
An
independent moderator benchmarked the improved COGNET/iGEN model
against human performance data from a simplified Air Traffic
Control task.
The COGNET/iGEN model came through with high marks. It accurately
predicted human behavior for reaction times, error rates, and
even subject self-assessments of workload under different Air
Traffic Control conditions. Overall, COGNET/iGEN performed the
best of all models tested (category learning comparisons are
not yet complete). These new modeling features have been incorporated
into the commercial iGEN human modeling software.
Click
here for screen shots
Reference
Zachary,
W., Santarelli, T., Ryder, J., Stokes, J., and Scolaro, D. (2001).
Developing a Multi-tasking Cognitive Agent Using the COGNET/iGEN
Integrative Architecture. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference
on Computer-Generated Forces and Behavior Representation. IEEE/ITCMS,
Piscataway, NJ, pp 79-90.
Zachary, W., Le Mentec, J-C, Iordanov, V. (2001). Generating
Subjective Workload Self-Assessment from a Cognitive Model.
In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Cognitive
Modeling, Fairfax, VA: Erlbaum.
Gluck, K., and Pew, R. (2001). Overview of the Agent-based Modeling
and Behavior Representation (AMBR) Model Comparison Project.
In Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Computer-Generated
Forces and Behavior Representation. IEEE/ITCMS, Piscataway,
NJ, pp 3-6.
Tenney, Y., and Spector, S. (2001). Comparisons of HBR Models
with Human-in-the-loop Performance in a Simplified Air Traffic
Control Simulation with and without HLA Protocols: Task Simulation,
Human Data and Results. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference
on Computer-Generated Forces and Behavior Representation. IEEE/ITCMS,
Piscataway, NJ, pp 15-26.
Return
to Case Studies